The 'hw:numa_mempolicy' parameter was never implemented and will likely
never be, however, it's located in the 'implemented' folder suggesting
otherwise. Seeing as specs are as much a reference as anything, this
invalid information should not be retained. Correct this, taking the
opportunity to fix some other typo, line wrapping and general
formatting.
Change-Id: I4aca0073f1fa26ff0c3a34407370f6ba6d916879
s/prefered/preferred for hw_numa_mempolicy's setting.
Change-Id: Id82b919c27c0ebf166b6ab7ee6b64e968a8b991f
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
The NUMA work did not integrate with the extensible resource
tracker since it was not suitable at the time.
The memory property values should be recorded in MB rather
than in GB.
Change-Id: I76c56e5e0a9eed7faf44d1fe376b6d15247c2c92
As discussed at our nova meetings, reorganize the juno specs into
three directories:
- proposed: things proposed which weren't approved
- approved: things we approved but didn't implement
- implemented: things approved and implemented
The first I suspect is the most controversial. I've done this
because I worry about the case where a future developer wants to
pick up something dropped by a previous developer, but has trouble
finding previous proposed specifications on the topic. Note that
the actual proposed specs for Juno are adding in a later commit.
Change-Id: Idcf55ca37a83d7098dcb7c2971240c4e8fd23dc8
Stephen Finucane