Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Dent 787bb33606 Use external placement in functional tests
Adjust the fixtures used by the functional tests so they
use placement database and web fixtures defined by placement
code. To avoid making redundant changes, the solely placement-
related unit and functional tests are removed, but the placement
code itself is not (yet).

openstack-placement is required by the functional tests. It is not
added to test-requirements as we do not want unit tests to depend
on placement in any way, and we enforce this by not having placement
in the test env.

The concept of tox-siblings is used to ensure that the
placement requirement will be satisfied correctly if there is a
depends-on. To make this happen, the functional jobs defined in
.zuul.yaml are updated to require openstack/placement.

tox.ini has to be updated to use a envdir that is the same
name as job. Otherwise the tox siblings role in ansible cannot work.

The handling of the placement fixtures is moved out of nova/test.py
into the functional tests that actually use it because we do not
want unit tests (which get the base test class out of test.py) to
have anything to do with placement. This requires adjusting some
test files to use absolute import.

Similarly, a test of the comparison function for the api samples tests
is moved into functional, because it depends on placement functionality,

TestUpgradeCheckResourceProviders in unit.cmd.test_status is moved into
a new test file: nova/tests/functional/test_nova_status.py. This is done
because it requires the PlacementFixture, which is only available to
functional tests. A MonkeyPatch is required in the test to make sure that
the right context managers are used at the right time in the command
itself (otherwise some tables do no exist). In the test itself, to avoid
speaking directly to the placement database, which would require
manipulating the RequestContext objects, resource providers are now
created over the API.

Co-Authored-By: Balazs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer@ericsson.com>
Change-Id: Idaed39629095f86d24a54334c699a26c218c6593
2018-12-12 18:46:49 +00:00
Chris Dent 5787ab46d4 Do not use nova.test in placement.test_fault_wrap
The tests are very straightforward and do not require any of the setup
and fixtures that nova.test.NoDBTestCase supplies. Also, in the future
of placement extraction we don't want the dependecy.

By not using NoDBTestCase we lose a fixture that captures stderr output,
produced when the exception used by the tests is (intentionally) raised.
This adds slightly to the volume of output in test logs but is light
enough to not yet be a concern and adds some useful visibility.

We can explore adding such capturing back, as we create fixtures
specific to placement.

Partially implements blueprint placement-extract

Change-Id: Iba3455a7858badb34d4224429acb69273e6a88c4
2018-06-07 05:44:36 +08:00
Chris Dent 5f881ff030 [placement] use simple FaultWrapper
Prior to this patch placement was using the nova FaultWrapper
middleware as a final guard against unexpected exceptions. That
middleware does more than required and also imports stuff that
placement does not otherwise require.

The new middleware is only for exceptions that have fallen through
previous handling and need to be turned into 500 responses, formatted
to JSON, and logged.

While doing this it became clear that the limited Exception catching
in handler.py was redundant if FaultWrapper and the Microversion
middlewares (both required for the operation of the system) are
involved, so that has been removed, with a comment.

This should not require a microversion as the structure of successful
responses and expected error responses does not change. What does
change is that a 500 response will be formatted more as the api-wg
errors guideline[1] desires.

[1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/errors.html

Change-Id: Ib2c3250b964a30239f298cdf13ea2020f205f67d
Partial-Bug: #1743120
2018-02-28 20:34:12 +00:00