Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Dent 787bb33606 Use external placement in functional tests
Adjust the fixtures used by the functional tests so they
use placement database and web fixtures defined by placement
code. To avoid making redundant changes, the solely placement-
related unit and functional tests are removed, but the placement
code itself is not (yet).

openstack-placement is required by the functional tests. It is not
added to test-requirements as we do not want unit tests to depend
on placement in any way, and we enforce this by not having placement
in the test env.

The concept of tox-siblings is used to ensure that the
placement requirement will be satisfied correctly if there is a
depends-on. To make this happen, the functional jobs defined in
.zuul.yaml are updated to require openstack/placement.

tox.ini has to be updated to use a envdir that is the same
name as job. Otherwise the tox siblings role in ansible cannot work.

The handling of the placement fixtures is moved out of nova/test.py
into the functional tests that actually use it because we do not
want unit tests (which get the base test class out of test.py) to
have anything to do with placement. This requires adjusting some
test files to use absolute import.

Similarly, a test of the comparison function for the api samples tests
is moved into functional, because it depends on placement functionality,

TestUpgradeCheckResourceProviders in unit.cmd.test_status is moved into
a new test file: nova/tests/functional/test_nova_status.py. This is done
because it requires the PlacementFixture, which is only available to
functional tests. A MonkeyPatch is required in the test to make sure that
the right context managers are used at the right time in the command
itself (otherwise some tables do no exist). In the test itself, to avoid
speaking directly to the placement database, which would require
manipulating the RequestContext objects, resource providers are now
created over the API.

Co-Authored-By: Balazs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer@ericsson.com>
Change-Id: Idaed39629095f86d24a54334c699a26c218c6593
2018-12-12 18:46:49 +00:00
Jay Pipes 368b6d9293 support multiple member_of qparams
Adds a new placement API microversion that supports specifying multiple
member_of parameters to the GET /resource_providers and GET
/allocation_candidates API endpoints.

When multiple member_of parameters are found, they are passed down to
the ResourceProviderList.get_by_filters() method as a list. Items in
this list are lists of aggregate UUIDs.

The list of member_of items is evaluated so that resource providers
matching ALL of the member_of constraints are returned.

When a member_of item contains multiple UUIDs, we look up resource
providers that have *any* of those aggregate UUIDs associated with them.

Change-Id: Ib4f1955f06f2159dfb221f3d2bc8ff7bfce71ee2
blueprint: alloc-candidates-member-of
2018-05-03 09:02:29 -04:00
Ed Leafe 77d3fc3838 Address issues raised in adding member_of to GET /a-c
In an earlier patch [0], there were some valid criticisms noted. They
were not critical enough to require holding off on that patch, so they
are being addressed here in a follow-up patch.

[0] I5857e927a830914c96e040936804e322baccc24c

Blueprint: alloc-candidates-member-of

Change-Id: I762dc4a70613056f1bd9ba7bf11c3a4588bdac70
2018-04-24 17:03:56 +00:00
Ed Leafe a69e05d29a Add 'member_of' param to GET /allocation_candidates
The call to GET /allocation_candidates now accepts a 'member_of'
parameter, representing one or more aggregate UUIDs. If this parameter
is supplied, the allocation_candidates returned will be limited to those
with resource_providers that belong to at least one of the supplied
aggregates.

Blueprint: alloc-candidates-member-of

Change-Id: I5857e927a830914c96e040936804e322baccc24c
2018-03-16 16:32:02 +00:00