Adjust the fixtures used by the functional tests so they
use placement database and web fixtures defined by placement
code. To avoid making redundant changes, the solely placement-
related unit and functional tests are removed, but the placement
code itself is not (yet).
openstack-placement is required by the functional tests. It is not
added to test-requirements as we do not want unit tests to depend
on placement in any way, and we enforce this by not having placement
in the test env.
The concept of tox-siblings is used to ensure that the
placement requirement will be satisfied correctly if there is a
depends-on. To make this happen, the functional jobs defined in
.zuul.yaml are updated to require openstack/placement.
tox.ini has to be updated to use a envdir that is the same
name as job. Otherwise the tox siblings role in ansible cannot work.
The handling of the placement fixtures is moved out of nova/test.py
into the functional tests that actually use it because we do not
want unit tests (which get the base test class out of test.py) to
have anything to do with placement. This requires adjusting some
test files to use absolute import.
Similarly, a test of the comparison function for the api samples tests
is moved into functional, because it depends on placement functionality,
TestUpgradeCheckResourceProviders in unit.cmd.test_status is moved into
a new test file: nova/tests/functional/test_nova_status.py. This is done
because it requires the PlacementFixture, which is only available to
functional tests. A MonkeyPatch is required in the test to make sure that
the right context managers are used at the right time in the command
itself (otherwise some tables do no exist). In the test itself, to avoid
speaking directly to the placement database, which would require
manipulating the RequestContext objects, resource providers are now
created over the API.
Co-Authored-By: Balazs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer@ericsson.com>
Change-Id: Idaed39629095f86d24a54334c699a26c218c6593
When updating a parent provider of a resource provider, placement
didn't update a root provider of another resource provider in the
same tree.
This patch fixes it to update the root provider field of all the
resource providers in the same tree.
Change-Id: Icdedc10cdd5ebfda672ca2d65a75bf0143aa769c
Closes-Bug: #1779818
This patch adds a test that shows that when updating a parent provider
of a resource provider, placement doesn't update a root provider of
another resource provider in the same tree.
Change-Id: I4f58752444cf6dff6b19dabd7a5a829cbf636678
Related-Bug: #1779818
Chris Dent