Adjust the fixtures used by the functional tests so they
use placement database and web fixtures defined by placement
code. To avoid making redundant changes, the solely placement-
related unit and functional tests are removed, but the placement
code itself is not (yet).
openstack-placement is required by the functional tests. It is not
added to test-requirements as we do not want unit tests to depend
on placement in any way, and we enforce this by not having placement
in the test env.
The concept of tox-siblings is used to ensure that the
placement requirement will be satisfied correctly if there is a
depends-on. To make this happen, the functional jobs defined in
.zuul.yaml are updated to require openstack/placement.
tox.ini has to be updated to use a envdir that is the same
name as job. Otherwise the tox siblings role in ansible cannot work.
The handling of the placement fixtures is moved out of nova/test.py
into the functional tests that actually use it because we do not
want unit tests (which get the base test class out of test.py) to
have anything to do with placement. This requires adjusting some
test files to use absolute import.
Similarly, a test of the comparison function for the api samples tests
is moved into functional, because it depends on placement functionality,
TestUpgradeCheckResourceProviders in unit.cmd.test_status is moved into
a new test file: nova/tests/functional/test_nova_status.py. This is done
because it requires the PlacementFixture, which is only available to
functional tests. A MonkeyPatch is required in the test to make sure that
the right context managers are used at the right time in the command
itself (otherwise some tables do no exist). In the test itself, to avoid
speaking directly to the placement database, which would require
manipulating the RequestContext objects, resource providers are now
created over the API.
Co-Authored-By: Balazs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer@ericsson.com>
Change-Id: Idaed39629095f86d24a54334c699a26c218c6593
To facilitate opaqueness of resource provider generation internals, we
need to return the (initial) generation when a provider is created. For
consistency with other APIs, we will do this by returning the entire
resource provider record (which includes the generation) from POST
/resource_providers.
Change-Id: I8624e194fe0173531c5aa2119c903e3c68b8c6cd
blueprint: generation-from-create-provider
Placement API microversion 1.19 enhances the payloads for the `GET
/resource_providers/{uuid}/aggregates` response and the `PUT
/resource_providers/{uuid}/aggregates` request and response to be
identical, and to include the ``resource_provider_generation``. As with
other generation-aware APIs, if the ``resource_provider_generation``
specified in the `PUT` request does not match the generation known by
the server, a 409 Conflict error is returned.
Change-Id: I86416e35da1798cdf039b42c9ed7629f0f9c75fc
blueprint: placement-aggregate-generation
If a gabbi file sets a default microversion by setting a header
'OpenStack-API-Version' with a value like 'placement latest' and then
later overrides that in an individual test with a header of
'openstack-api-version' the difference in case can lead to failure.
In the best case the failure is consistent.
In the worst case it can sometimes work, because the header shows up
twice in the request, and the last header wins, order in the headers
and the resulting list dependent on the vagrancies of python ordering.
The solution is to always use the same case, so this change updates
all use to be lowercase, to establish a precedent that future people
will be able to use as an example.
Note that gabbi is case sensitive here in part because of the
implementation but also because it provides the control and possibility
to test exactly this problem.
Change-Id: I1e89e231cf0d46d211d360cda091b33520f85027
Closes-Bug: #1728934
The change adds a gabbi test to cover the case where one of the resources
comes from shared resource provider that uses a custom resource class.
There had been a bug in the SQL that caused this to be incorrect, it is
now fixed. This simply adds some additional tests to confirm things are
working as desired. See the related bug for more information.
The behavior with the same query on /allocation_candidates and
/resource_providers is intentionally different, as described in the
comments on the last two tests.
Change-Id: Ic42f0cd74665574129d36eeaa093f3f316879592
Related-Bug: #1705231
Chris Dent