Add Production Use data for Newton
Using Survey data for deployments updated between 2016-05 and 2016-10-06, * Isolate deployments in "Production or Full Operational Use" * Look for project usage either in "Production" or "Testing" * Count the project use, and calculate an overall percentage by dividing by the number of deployments (167) Barbican (Key Management) 8 4.790419 Ceilometer (Metering & Monitoring) 101 60.479042 Cinder (Block Storage) 145 86.826347 Congress (Governance Service) 4 2.395210 Cue (Message Broker Service) 3 1.796407 Designate (DNS Service) 31 18.562874 Glance (Image Service) 152 91.017964 Heat (Orchestration) 108 64.670659 Horizon (Dashboard) 150 89.820359 Ironic (Bare Metal) 42 25.149701 Keystone (Identity Service) 152 91.017964 Kolla (Containerized Deployment) 11 6.586826 Magnum(Containers Service) 21 12.574850 Manila (Shared File Systems) 19 11.377246 Mistral (Workflow Service) 4 2.395210 Murano (Application Catalog) 20 11.976048 Neutron (Networking) 153 91.616766 Nova (Compute) 162 97.005988 Rally (Benchmark Service) 36 21.556886 Sahara (Data Processing) 18 10.778443 Solum (Software Dev Lifecycle Mgmt) 1 0.598802 Swift (Object Storage) 78 46.706587 TripleO (Deployment) 11 6.586826 Trove (Database Service) 29 17.365269 Zaqar (Message Service) 4 2.395210 Change-Id: I9c9123bd226ec8edb678eace9d4ffc660649e468
This commit is contained in:
parent
85a33a03d4
commit
b3c651d971
|
@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"Compute service (Nova)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "98%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Object Storage service (Swift)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "47%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Image service (Glance)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "92%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Identity service (Keystone)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "92%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Dashboard (Horizon)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "92%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Networking service (Neutron)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "93%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Block Storage service (Cinder)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "88%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Telemetry service (Ceilometer)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "62%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Orchestration service (Heat)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "66%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Database service (Trove)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "17%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Data Processing service (Sahara)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "11%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Bare Metal service (Ironic)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "25%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Message service (Zaqar)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Key Management service (Barbican)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "5%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"DNS service (Designate)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "19%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Shared File Systems service (Manila)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "11%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Benchmark service (Rally)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "23%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Containers service (Magnum)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "13%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Application Catalog service (Murano)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "12%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Deployment service (TripleO)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "7%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Governance service (Congress)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Container-based deployment tools (Kolla)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "7%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Workflow service (Mistral)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Message Broker service (Cue)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Software Dev Lifecycle Management service (Solum)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "1%"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue