# Tests of allocation candidates API

fixtures:
    - NUMAAggregateFixture

defaults:
    request_headers:
        x-auth-token: admin
        accept: application/json
        openstack-api-version: placement 1.32

tests:

- name: get allocation candidates without aggregate
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1
  response_json_paths:
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 4
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1

- name: get allocation candidates with aggregate A
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate A is on the root rps (both cn1 and cn2) so it spans on the
      # whole tree. We have full allocations here.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 4
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1

- name: get allocation candidates with aggregate A granular
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources1=VCPU:1&member_of1=$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate A is on the root rps (both cn1 and cn2) so it spans on the
      # whole tree, but only for the unsuffixed request group.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 0

- name: get allocation candidates with aggregate B
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGB_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate B is on the root of cn2 so it spans on the
      # whole tree including rps of NUMA2_1 and NUMA2_2.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 2
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1

- name: get allocation candidates with aggregate C
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate C is *NOT* on the root, so we should get only NUMA1_1
      # here that is only the rp in aggregate C.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1

- name: get allocation candidates with aggregate C granular
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources1=VCPU:1&member_of1=$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate C is only on NUMA1_1.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000
  response_json_paths:
      # Since `members_of` query parameter is not specified, sharing rp 1 is
      # being shared with the *whole* trees of CN1 and CN2. Sharing rp 2 is
      # being shared with the *whole* tree of CN1.
      # As a result, there should be 6 allocation candidates:
      #   [
      #     (numa1-1, ss1), (numa1-2, ss1), (numa2-1, ss1), (numa2-2, ss1),
      #     (numa1-1, ss2),
      #   ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 6
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: [1, 1]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: [1, 1]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000, 1000, 1000]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS2_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000]

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage with aggregate A
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 4
      # Since aggregate A is specified, which is on the root CN1, sharing
      # rp 1 can be allocation candidates with the *whole* trees in CN1.
      # Sharing rp 2 can't in the allocation candidates since it is not
      # under aggregate A but under aggregate C.
      # As a result, there should be 4 allocation candidates:
      #   [
      #     (numa1-1, ss1), (numa1-2, ss1), (numa2-1, ss1), (numa2-2, ss1)
      #   ]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000, 1000, 1000]

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage with aggregate B
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGB_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # We don't have shared disk in aggregate B.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 0

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage with aggregate C
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Since aggregate C is specified, which is on *non-root*, NUMA1_1,
      # sharing provider 2 is not shared with the whole tree. It is shared
      # with rps only with aggregate C for their own (opposite to not on root).
      # As a result, there should be 1 allocation candidate:
      #   [
      #     (numa1-1, ss2),
      #   ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS2_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: 1000

# Tests for negative aggregate membership from microversion 1.32.
# The negative aggregate feature had not yet been implemented when bug1792503
# was reported, but we include the tests here to make sure that it is
# consistent with the positive aggregate strategy with nested providers above.
- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage without aggregate A
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=!$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate A is on the root rps (both cn1 and cn2) so it spans on the
      # whole tree. We have no allocation requests here.
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 0

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage without aggregate B
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=!$ENVIRON['AGGB_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate B is on the root of cn2 and it spans on the whole tree
      # including rps of NUMA2_1 and NUMA2_2 so we exclude them.
      # As a result, there should be 4 allocation candidates:
      #   [
      #     (numa1-1, ss1), (numa1-2, ss1),
      #     (numa1-1, ss2), (numa1-2, ss2),
      #   ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 4
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: [1, 1]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: [1, 1]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000]
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS2_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000]

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage without aggregate C
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=!$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate C is *NOT* on the root. We should exclude NUMA1_1 and SS2,
      # but we should get NUMA1_2
      #    [
      #      (numa1-2, ss1), (numa2-1, ss1), (numa2-2, ss1)
      #    ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 3
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000, 1000]

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage in (aggA or aggB) and (not aggC)
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=in:$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID'],$ENVIRON['AGGB_UUID']&member_of=!$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate C is *NOT* on the root. We should exclude NUMA1_1 and SS2,
      # but we should get NUMA1_2
      #    [
      #      (numa1-2, ss1), (numa2-1, ss1), (numa2-2, ss1)
      #    ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 3
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_1_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA2_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: [1000, 1000, 1000]

- name: get allocation candidates with shared storage neither in aggB nor in aggC but in aggA
  GET: /allocation_candidates?resources=VCPU:1,DISK_GB:1000&member_of=$ENVIRON['AGGA_UUID']&member_of=!in:$ENVIRON['AGGB_UUID'],$ENVIRON['AGGC_UUID']
  response_json_paths:
      # Aggregate B is on the root. We should exclude all the rps on CN2
      # Aggregate C is *NOT* on the root. We should exclude NUMA1_1 and SS2,
      # but we should get NUMA1_1
      #    [
      #      (numa1-1, ss1)
      #    ]
      $.allocation_requests.`len`: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['NUMA1_2_UUID']"].resources.VCPU: 1
      $.allocation_requests..allocations["$ENVIRON['SS1_UUID']"].resources.DISK_GB: 1000