diff --git a/648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16 b/648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16
index fc4daeae..755b12e7 100644
--- a/648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16
+++ b/648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16
@@ -34,6 +34,23 @@
       "parentUuid": "291e66b1_ae38426c",
       "revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "d761e016_5308673b",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 5314
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-21T15:03:20Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Sylvain is correct.  This patch, if merged, would put 5 people affiliated with Red Hat on the TC, and 5/9 \u003e 1/2, which would violate the TC diversity requirement.  So unless one of the Red Hat people bows out and creates a vacancy (the highest-ranking non-elected candidate is not affiliated with Red Hat), the current TC will have to temporarily waive the diversity requirement, or come up with some other solution consistent with the TC charter.  In any case, proposed patch to tc.yaml can\u0027t be merged yet.\n\nI suggest separating out ptl.yaml onto a separate patch so it can be merged right away, and then the tc.yaml can be handled separately.",
+      "revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     }
   ]
 }
\ No newline at end of file