91 lines
4.1 KiB
Plaintext
91 lines
4.1 KiB
Plaintext
{
|
|
"comments": [
|
|
{
|
|
"unresolved": false,
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "291e66b1_ae38426c",
|
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
|
"patchSetId": 1
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 7166
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2024-03-21T12:59:12Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/charter.html#tc-diversity-requirement requires some discussion as if we would merge this, 5 TC members would be Affiliated.",
|
|
"revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"unresolved": false,
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "255fe221_6dff6f7e",
|
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
|
"patchSetId": 1
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 27900
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2024-03-21T14:23:41Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "just for reference (not influence), my affiliation unexpectedly changed and in 1 week I become unaffiliated.",
|
|
"parentUuid": "291e66b1_ae38426c",
|
|
"revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"unresolved": false,
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "d761e016_5308673b",
|
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
|
"patchSetId": 1
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 5314
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2024-03-21T15:03:20Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "Sylvain is correct. This patch, if merged, would put 5 people affiliated with Red Hat on the TC, and 5/9 \u003e 1/2, which would violate the TC diversity requirement. So unless one of the Red Hat people bows out and creates a vacancy (the highest-ranking non-elected candidate is not affiliated with Red Hat), the current TC will have to temporarily waive the diversity requirement, or come up with some other solution consistent with the TC charter. In any case, proposed patch to tc.yaml can\u0027t be merged yet.\n\nI suggest separating out ptl.yaml onto a separate patch so it can be merged right away, and then the tc.yaml can be handled separately.",
|
|
"revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"unresolved": false,
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "5814bc69_b993b7dc",
|
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
|
"patchSetId": 1
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 14482
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2024-03-21T15:26:34Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "Thank you @bauzas and all for the comments. The discussion is also going on through another patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/913912 and #openstack-election and #openstack-tc IRC channels like [1] and [2].\n\nTwo additional thoughts needs to be considered: 1) voting and election results considering TC Charter and Foundation by laws are different 2) An additional field like note/comment on the current yaml file format might be needed.\n\n[1] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-election/%23openstack-election.2024-03-20.log.html\n[2] https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2024-03-21.log.html#t2024-03-21T15:04:32",
|
|
"revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"unresolved": false,
|
|
"key": {
|
|
"uuid": "79b661b0_c3f35c23",
|
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
|
"patchSetId": 1
|
|
},
|
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"id": 8556
|
|
},
|
|
"writtenOn": "2024-03-21T15:38:18Z",
|
|
"side": 1,
|
|
"message": "Diversity thing is there but I do not think we need to hold this change to merge as this is publishing the election result and how diversity thing needs to be handled in governance change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/913912.\n\nThis change just show the election result which we should publish as it is anyways.",
|
|
"parentUuid": "5814bc69_b993b7dc",
|
|
"revId": "648bbc76f91542ef62dcf9e44f979c7181dc1b16",
|
|
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
} |