Update patch set 6
Patch Set 6: (1 comment) Patch-set: 6 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 17068 \u003c17068@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_17068\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
307b8f644f
commit
a425abe9fd
|
@ -68,6 +68,23 @@
|
|||
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "33b182cf_b53af7b3",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 6
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 17068
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2022-07-11T10:08:07Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Regardless on how we intend to do it, please make sure we are inclusive.\nThis was discussed as a first step. So if we change the first step without linking to the next, it is possible to lose people on the way. In other words: it would be nice if people can follow the next steps from here 😊.\nOverall, I am happy with the scope.\n\nFor the record, I think Sylvain\u0027s point is well phrased and could deserve to be part of the scope explicitly (at least item 1).",
|
||||
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue