Update patch set 6

Patch Set 6: Rollcall-Vote+1

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 6
Reviewer: Gerrit User 5314 <5314@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Rollcall-Vote=+1
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 5314 2022-07-08 13:40:44 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent eb223bec06
commit b61d05d509
1 changed files with 34 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -17,6 +17,23 @@
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "57b0391c_b2ada921",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 6
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 5314
},
"writtenOn": "2022-07-08T13:40:44Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I think we should get this started as an OpenStack SIG, and if it meets with success, there\u0027s nothing preventing the Foundation from supporting an OpenInfra-wide SIG on the same topic that incorporates efforts from other OpenInfra projects.\n\nI share Kendall\u0027s worry from earlier reviews that if we don\u0027t get this started with a focused effort, it may not gain much traction. There\u0027s plenty of work for us to do in OpenStack, for example, I\u0027ve always thought of the multi-arch SIG effort to get arm64 into the OpenStack CI pipeline as an environmental effort given the lower power consumption of ARM processors. My opinion is: start the SIG and let\u0027s see what happens.",
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
@ -63,6 +80,23 @@
},
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "9c3c84d2_4dc93806",
"filename": "sigs.yaml",
"patchSetId": 6
},
"lineNbr": 355,
"author": {
"id": 5314
},
"writtenOn": "2022-07-08T13:40:44Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "nit: unrelated change",
"revId": "1cd850dda66584f1ac362ace04740adb756290dd",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}