From adb136fd6a255342dfe51461efad3e6fb4857d24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:29:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [WIP] Add resolutions folder and placeholders

Change-Id: I4a835fc4e730cf47774ff927e69e9056e39d3dce
Signed-off-by: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman@gmail.com>
---
 .../20182407-new-auc-recognition-criteria.rst | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 resolutions/index.rst                         | 17 ++++++
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 resolutions/20182407-new-auc-recognition-criteria.rst
 create mode 100644 resolutions/index.rst

diff --git a/resolutions/20182407-new-auc-recognition-criteria.rst b/resolutions/20182407-new-auc-recognition-criteria.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6c7667
--- /dev/null
+++ b/resolutions/20182407-new-auc-recognition-criteria.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+==========================================
+2018-07-24 AUC Recognition Criteria Update
+==========================================
+
+During the `Rocky PTG <https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Rocky-PTG>`_ among
+the many things we discussed was increasing the pool of AUCs. We identified
+areas we believed AUCs could be added from and recently voted to approve these
+additions. This resolution is to verify the vote and provide information as
+needed on what was voted on.
+
+**AUC Recognition Criteria**
+
+Summary:
+
+Criteria should be adjusted to be relevant to the state of the community today;
+i.e. SIGs. We are quite possibly missing up to at least 500 contributors who
+should be AUC eligible. We need to vote a) if the recommended additional pools
+should be used, b) publish AUCs (consider those who select anonymous for user
+survey), and c) official + unofficial should be eligible (there are some user
+groups who are not official but still are healthy).
+
+Additional Pools:
+
+* User Survey - people who completed a deployment (~550)
+* Ops midcycle attendees instead of just session moderators (~50)
+* OpenStack Days organizers (~100)
+* SIG users (as suggested by SIG leaders) (~25)
+* Active WoO participants (~10)
+* Active Diversity WG participants (~10)
+
+**Notes:**
+
+SIG leaders should provide active participants who should be AUC and will follow
+process of extra-auc as Team and Working Group leaders do. For SIG, can we have
+the SIG leader to update on the AUC list, for example:
+
+* https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/I18nTeam/ATC_statistics
+* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532982/
+* https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464051
+
+While it is possibly extra work for the chairs/leaders it just seems right to
+prefer having to provide a list of active members who deserve it than it not be
+earned.
+
+AUCs are required to be Foundation Members; this document does not supersede
+existing requirements but seeks to at least augment them with additional pools
+AUCs can be obtained from.
+
+**Vote Results:**
+
+Additional Pools:
+
+* User Survey - People who completed a deployment (~550) - Y
+* Ops Midcycle Session Moderators and Event Organizers (~30) - Y
+* OpenStack Days Session Moderators and Event Organizers (~200) - Y
+* SIG Users (as suggested by SIG leaders) (~25) - Y
+* Active WoO Participants (~10) - Y
+* Active Diversity WG Participants (~10) - Y
diff --git a/resolutions/index.rst b/resolutions/index.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ced098e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/resolutions/index.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+.. _resolutions:
+
+=============
+ Resolutions
+=============
+
+When a motion does not result in a change in a reference doc, it can
+be expressed as a resolution.
+
+2018
+====
+
+.. toctree::
+   :maxdepth: 1
+   :glob:
+
+   2018*