2021 User Survey TC Question Analysis
This is a follow-up to our 2019 analysis of the user survey results. This includes comparisons between the 2019 and 2021 date. Change-Id: I1161093d2d728e5d4c875f6db65b0bbdcb79201b
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e4c7c5d33
commit
0cfbf9e9cd
|
@ -90,3 +90,4 @@ of those responses.
|
|||
:titlesonly:
|
||||
|
||||
user_survey/analysis-12-2019
|
||||
user_survey/analysis-04-2022
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
|
|||
=====================================
|
||||
Analysis of 2021 User Survey Feedback
|
||||
=====================================
|
||||
|
||||
Introduction
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
The OpenStack Technical Committee (TC) added questions to the User Survey for
|
||||
the first time in 2019. The following questions were asked by the TC:
|
||||
|
||||
* How do you upgrade your version of OpenStack?
|
||||
* Once on a given release, do you use stable branches for bug-fix upgrades?
|
||||
* To which projects does your organization contribute maintenance resources,
|
||||
such as patches for bug fixes and code reviews on master or stable
|
||||
branches?
|
||||
* How do members of your organization contribute to OpenStack?
|
||||
* What prevents you or your organization from contributing more maintenance
|
||||
resources, or makes contributing difficult?
|
||||
* Other ways to participate?
|
||||
|
||||
The intention of these questions was to understand how users are maintaining
|
||||
their OpenStack clouds and how they are interacting with the community. In the
|
||||
case that they weren't currently interacting with the community it was hoped
|
||||
that the questions would spark thoughts on how they could participate in the
|
||||
future.
|
||||
|
||||
After the initial 2019 User Survey, the Technical Committee reviewed the
|
||||
responses and decided that we would keep the questions the same for future
|
||||
surveys with one exception. It was decided that the 'Other ways to participate'
|
||||
question should be changed to a free-form field that could be completed in the case
|
||||
that 'other' was selected in response to the question: 'How do members of
|
||||
your organization contribute to OpenStack'.
|
||||
|
||||
This round of analysis will look at the results from the 2021 User Survey in
|
||||
comparison to the
|
||||
`2019 results <https://governance.openstack.org/tc/user_survey/analysis-12-2019.html>`_.
|
||||
The 2019 User Survey result analysis is being used for comparison as
|
||||
the TC did not perform an analysis of the 2020 User Survey results.
|
||||
As with the previous analysis, the analysis will be performed on a per-question
|
||||
basis with an over-all summary at the end.
|
||||
|
||||
How do you upgrade your version of OpenStack?
|
||||
---------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
As with the 2019 User Survey, this is the question that got the greatest number of
|
||||
responses. Since responses to none of the questions are mandatory we need to infer the
|
||||
total number that responded. There were only a couple of respondents that answered other TC
|
||||
questions while leaving this answer blank. As a result, the number of responses, 276, was used
|
||||
as the estimated total number of respondents to the TC's question.
|
||||
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Response | Number of Users | Percentage of Responses |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Upgrade all coordinated releases (once every 6 months) | 83 | 30 |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Skip/Fast-forward releases | 91 | 33 |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Not Upgrade | 65 | 23 |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Deploy Regularly from master branch | 13 | 5 |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Deploy all intermediary releases and all | 20 | 7 |
|
||||
| coordinated releases | | |
|
||||
+--------------------------------------------------------+-----------------+-------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
The total number of responses for 2021 was somewhat lower than the 337 responses that
|
||||
were submitted in 2019. There are a couple of positive trends, however, to notice. The first one
|
||||
being that the number of 'Not Upgrade' responses decreased significantly. In 2019 35% of
|
||||
respondents indicated they did not upgrade as compared to 23% in 2021. The percentage of users
|
||||
that indicated that they 'Deployed Regularly from master branch' also decreased from 9% to 5%
|
||||
while 'Deploy all intermediary releases and all coordinated releases' stayed constant at 7%.
|
||||
|
||||
The increase in users upgrading their releases appears to be pretty evenly spread, percentage wise,
|
||||
between 'Upgrade all coordinated releases (once every 6 months)' and 'Skip/Fast-forward releases'
|
||||
increasing from 22% to 30% and 27% to 33% respectively. Unfortunately, we don't know that the
|
||||
respondents that no longer indicated that they did not upgrade are the same ones that now indicate
|
||||
that they do upgrade. With that said, the decrease does appear to be a positive trend. It will be
|
||||
worth watching these results in subsequent surveys to see if that trend continues.
|
||||
|
||||
One other data point worth noting is the fact that we have reached a point where the number of
|
||||
users using the 'Upgrade all coordinated releases' and 'Skip/Fast-forward releases' options
|
||||
are comparable. The TC sees this as an indication that the changes we have made in the
|
||||
release process to allow doing Skip/Fast-forward upgrades have been worth the effort that
|
||||
was required. As we continue to improve/refine the upgrade options these are data points
|
||||
that we will want to continue to watch.
|
||||
|
||||
Once on a given release, do you use stable branches for bug-fix upgrades?
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Consistent with the 2019 survey, the number of responses to this question was high, at 265 responses
|
||||
and had a notable total increase from 216 responses in 2019.
|
||||
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Answer | Users | Percentage of Responses |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| I do not do bug-fix upgrades | 46 | 17 |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Yes, backporting specific fixes | 44 | 17 |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Yes, deploying every commit on the stable branch | 18 | 7 |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Yes, upgrading at various points in time depending on fixes | 75 | 28 |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Yes, using only official point releases | 79 | 30 |
|
||||
+-------------------------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
The responses in 2021 were very consistent with the 2019 results. The number of users reporting
|
||||
that they do not do bug-fix upgrades or backport specific fixes decreased from 19% and
|
||||
21% respectively. The number of respondents that indicate that they only deploy official point
|
||||
releases also decreased slightly from 31% to 30%.
|
||||
|
||||
While the number of users to indicate that they deploy every commit remained the least reported
|
||||
approach, it did increase from 4% in 2019 to 7% in 2021. Users indicating that they upgrade
|
||||
depending on the fixes available increased from 26% to 28%.
|
||||
|
||||
So, overall, the results for this question in the 2021 survey were consistent with those collected in 2019.
|
||||
|
||||
To which projects does your organization contribute maintenance resources such as patches for bug and reviews on master or stable branches?
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This question had a good increase in responses compared to 2019, with only about 33% of users
|
||||
responding previously compared to 128, or 46%, in 2021. As in 2019, the majority of contributions
|
||||
are made to `core projects
|
||||
<https://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/introduction/introduction-to-openstack.html#openstack-service-overview>`_ .
|
||||
There is, however, a new entry in the top five projects: Kolla.
|
||||
|
||||
`Kolla <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Kolla>`_ is an OpenStack community project that provides
|
||||
production ready containers and deployment tools for operating OpenStack clouds. Given the
|
||||
continued growth in popularity of containerizing workloads, the increase in contributors is
|
||||
not particularly surprising and would seem to be a good sign for OpenStack as users are seeking
|
||||
newer and better ways to deploy OpenStack clouds.
|
||||
|
||||
All of the projects in the top 5 showed a notable increase in reported participation from the
|
||||
2019 survey. While Glance was knocked out of the Top 5 projects, it still had a reported
|
||||
increase from 25 respondents indicating activity in the project to 27.
|
||||
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Project | Contributors |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Nova | 63 |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Neutron | 56 |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Cinder | 40 |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Keystone | 34 |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
| Kolla | 34 |
|
||||
+----------+--------------+
|
||||
|
||||
After the first review of these results in the 2019 user survey,
|
||||
the TC wanted to compare the number of respondents who reported they
|
||||
used a project as compared to the number who reported that they contribute
|
||||
to the project. For the 2021 results review we have continued this analysis
|
||||
but have also added the previous percentage of participation for
|
||||
reference. To get this information we considered the number of
|
||||
users who reported that they were using the project in production.
|
||||
Note that we did not count users who indicated that they were just
|
||||
testing a service or who indicated that they had the service
|
||||
installed as part of a Proof of Concept. So the number of users
|
||||
that are using any given service may be notably larger than
|
||||
indicated in the results below. Here are the results of
|
||||
that investigation.
|
||||
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Project | Contributors | Users | % Participation | 2019 % Participation |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Aodh | 3 | 31 | 9 | 25 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Barbican | 8 | 70 | 11 | 19 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Blazar | 6 | 4 | 150 | 100 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Ceilometer | 10 | 84 | 12 | 14 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Cinder | 40 | 216 | 19 | 9 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Cloudkitty | 4 | 12 | 33 | 23 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Cyborg | 3 | 4 | 75 | 100 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Designate | 13 | 55 | 24 | 25 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Glance | 27 | 231 | 12 | 8 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Heat | 13 | 164 | 8 | 8 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Horizon | 18 | 224 | 8 | 6 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Ironic | 23 | 65 | 35 | 27 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Keystone | 34 | 235 | 15 | 9 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Kolla | 34 | 69 | 49 | 52 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Kuryr | 5 | 8 | 63 | 71 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| LOCI | 3 | 7 | 43 | 40 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Magnum | 13 | 42 | 31 | 29 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Manila | 13 | 26 | 50 | 23 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Masakari | 2 | 14 | 14 | 17 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Mistral | 8 | 23 | 35 | 35 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Monasca | 4 | 33 | 12 | 23 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Murano | 3 | 6 | 50 | 18 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Neutron | 56 | 229 | 24 | 15 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Nova | 63 | 230 | 27 | 15 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Octavia | 26 | 89 | 29 | 35 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| OpenStack Client | 21 | 191 | 11 | 8 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| OpenStack Ansible | 27 | 59 | 46 | 38 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| OpenStack Helm | 5 | 14 | 36 | 23 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Panko | 3 | 7 | 43 | 45 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| QA | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Rally | 6 | 44 | 14 | 16 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Sahara | 1 | 2 | 50 | 21 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Senlin | 4 | 5 | 80 | N/A |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Swift | 19 | 102 | 19 | 11 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Tacker | 1 | 3 | 33 | 75 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Trove | 4 | 14 | 29 | 15 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| TripleO | 11 | 26 | 42 | 16 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Watcher | 2 | 6 | 33 | N/A |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Zaqar | 2 | 9 | 22 | 23 |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
| Zun | 2 | 8 | 25 | N/A |
|
||||
+-------------------+--------------+-------+-----------------+----------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
A couple of things to note from the results above. The numbers seem to
|
||||
confirm one concern that has been previously raised within the community.
|
||||
There appear to be a number of the smaller projects that are being used
|
||||
and maintained by a small group of OpenStack users. It is also interesting
|
||||
the disparity between the number of users and contributors for the core
|
||||
projects like Cinder, Glance, Horizon and Keystone. It is unclear from
|
||||
these results as to whether the disparity is because these projects
|
||||
have become more stable and don't require as much development or
|
||||
if there are other reasons for this disparity.
|
||||
|
||||
When considering the percentage of participation as compared to the 2019
|
||||
User Survey results there are a number of things to note. First, there
|
||||
has not been a notable decrease in user participation across projects.
|
||||
Also, it is interesting to note that a majority of projects continued to
|
||||
have consistent numbers as compared to the previous survey. A number of projects
|
||||
even showed an increase in participation. This is true for many of the
|
||||
core projects like Cinder, Keystone, Glance, Ironic, Neutron and Nova.
|
||||
We don't know if these changes are due to a change in the demographics of
|
||||
the respondents (more user/developers responding vs. just users) or if it
|
||||
is a positive indication in the health of the community. Overall, a key take
|
||||
away would be that project participation has remained largely stable or grown
|
||||
slightly since the last user survey.
|
||||
|
||||
How do members of your organization contribute to OpenStack?
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
As with the other questions in the user survey, this question also saw an increase
|
||||
in responses. 173 users responded for a total of 63% of the total.
|
||||
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Contribution | Users | Percentage of Responses |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Bug reports | 173 | 100 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Bug fixes on master | 85 | 49 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Participate in forum sessions at the summit | 59 | 34 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Participate in PTG sessions | 44 | 25 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Code review on master | 43 | 25 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Particpate in ops meetups | 43 | 25 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Documentation improvement | 39 | 23 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Backporting bug fixes to stable branches | 37 | 21 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Sponsor in-person events | 28 | 16 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Code review on stable branches | 26 | 15 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Feature design review | 22 | 13 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Contribute resources to run CI jobs upstream | 8 | 5 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
| Host third-party CI jobs downstream | 4 | 2 |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------+-------+-------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
In the 2019 survey the TC noted that the responses are very interesting given that
|
||||
this is a 'User Survey'. The responses show that OpenStack is unique in the fact that
|
||||
it is a user driven community with many of the users also being contributors. In fact
|
||||
we had more respondents indicating that they contributed to OpenStack than in 2019.
|
||||
|
||||
A couple of things of interest to note. First, the number of respondents that indicated
|
||||
they contributed bug reports increased notably from 86% in 2019 to 100% in 2021. More
|
||||
importantly, the number of users that indicated that they contribute bug fixes on master
|
||||
increased from 36% to 49%. This takes this response from 4th most popular way of
|
||||
contributing to 2nd!
|
||||
|
||||
Some of the decreased numbers in participation are likely to be due to the pandemic that
|
||||
we all have been dealing with. Reported participation in summit sessions and ops meetups
|
||||
both decreased from 47% to 34% and 39% to 25% respectively. Similarly, sponsorship of
|
||||
in-person events dropped from 20% to 16%. These drops, however, are not as significant as
|
||||
expected given the pandemic, which leads to TC to question these results. For future surveys
|
||||
we may want to look at the wording of the questions. Perhaps users are responding based
|
||||
upon all previous activity, not just the activity since the last user survey.
|
||||
|
||||
A decrease in participation that could have been anticipated by many of the community
|
||||
members is in code reviews for both master and stable branches. The number of users indicating
|
||||
participating in these activities decreased by 6% for master code reviews and 5% for stable
|
||||
branch reviews. This is consistent with what has been seen in many of the projects. Code is
|
||||
being submitted but the time required to get patches reviewed and merged has increased. This
|
||||
is also contributed to by a notable decrease in participants hosting third-party and CI job
|
||||
resources.
|
||||
|
||||
The rest of the participation responses were relatively consistent with what was reported
|
||||
in the 2019 User Survey.
|
||||
|
||||
What prevents you or your organization from contributing more maintenance resources, or makes contributing difficult?
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This question is the one that had the most notable increase in
|
||||
responses from 2019. Only 19% of users (69) responded to this
|
||||
question previously as compared to 47% (131) in 2021. This could
|
||||
be taken in a positive light, that more users are thinking
|
||||
about contributing. Unfortunately, the challenges continue to
|
||||
be similar.
|
||||
|
||||
Some combination of time, resources and company support accounted
|
||||
for more than half of the responses. Not having the appropriate skills
|
||||
to contribute was also a common theme in the responses. The TC might
|
||||
be able to help with this by raising awareness of the OpenStack Jobs
|
||||
board.
|
||||
|
||||
A few responses indicated that they felt that they were not able to
|
||||
contribute because the version of OpenStack that they are on was
|
||||
so far behind the current release. This response seems somewhat
|
||||
surprising as problems found in the older releases may still need to
|
||||
be fixed in the current release. In some cases, it is possible that
|
||||
the code will have changed significantly from the release that is running.
|
||||
With that said, this is a response that probably deserves further
|
||||
discussion by the TC.
|
||||
|
||||
The other response that was repeated by at least a few users was
|
||||
communication and timezone barriers. This is a challenge that has
|
||||
been known by the TC and OpenInfra Foundation for some time. Changes
|
||||
have been made to try to alleviate some of this problem but it
|
||||
sounds like it hasn't worked for everyone.
|
||||
|
||||
Other ways users participate:
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This was the field that we changed the wording for from the 2019 user
|
||||
survey. There were only two responses submitted: one listing bug reports
|
||||
again and one indicating that they work with vendors to submit requests
|
||||
for enhancement.
|
||||
|
||||
So, this field is not getting a lot of input. Worth discussion among the
|
||||
TC as to whether this should be removed or replaced with a different
|
||||
question.
|
||||
|
||||
Summary
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
In summary, the questions being asked by the TC in the User Survey are providing
|
||||
useful information. While it was unfortunate to see the total number of
|
||||
responses decrease, the fact that we had higher participation responding to the
|
||||
TC's questions is encouraging. Hopefully this trend will continue as the numbers
|
||||
are more meaningful as we have more years of data for comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
It is also encouraging to see the numbers moving in the desired direction for
|
||||
a number of the questions that we are asking. The responses to how/when users are
|
||||
upgrading their OpenStack clouds seems to suggest that the efforts of the TC and
|
||||
the community as a whole have had a positive impact on the user experience, or at
|
||||
least their upgrade habits. The overall improvement in user engagement, participating
|
||||
in the community is also encouraging. The data suggests that the OpenStack
|
||||
community continues to be a consistently active one.
|
||||
|
||||
All-in-all, the TC is pleased with the continued responses we are getting and
|
||||
would like to continue to collect this data for future analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Additional Resources
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The `OpenStack Survey Report
|
||||
<https://www.openstack.org/analytics>`_ also provides
|
||||
a graphical overview of the OpenStack Survey
|
||||
results.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue