From c02a073c523d363d7136677ab12884dc4ec03e6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: liupeng Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:52:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Placement Doc fix a small errors. Change-Id: I96c16e137a0c32552b8985b1444aecc86e816e3f --- doc/source/user/provider-tree.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/source/user/provider-tree.rst b/doc/source/user/provider-tree.rst index 1dbd393b8..02141bb8e 100644 --- a/doc/source/user/provider-tree.rst +++ b/doc/source/user/provider-tree.rst @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ would return two candidates. 1. ``NUMA1_1`` (``VCPU``) + ``CN1`` (``MEMORY_MB``, ``DISK_GB``) 2. ``NUMA1_2`` (``VCPU``) + ``CN1`` (``MEMORY_MB``, ``DISK_GB``) -This is because ``SS1`` is not in aggregate A, and because aggregate B on +This is because ``SS1`` is not in aggregate B, and because aggregate B on ``NUMA2_1`` doesn't span the whole tree since the ``NUMA2_1`` resource provider isn't a root resource provider.