Update patch set 1

Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 1
CC: Gerrit User 13252 <13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>

8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3

@@ -16,6 +16,46 @@
       "message": "Well, this is a simple description of the main idea. Should we add here anything else? Do you want any special handling of how to get membership?\n\nnote:\n- who became a member of openstack-unmaintained-core group will have right to add additional members to the group, there won\u0027t be a smaller group who controls the membership, as far as i understand the group setup\n- people who are added to the group will have rights to every repository and every unmaintained branch\n\nDo I understand this well? Do we want to have a formal way of membership query vial e.g. a mail to ML with [unmaintained] tag or something?",
       "revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "3a92a846_38d7e17c",
+        "filename": "doc/source/stable-branches.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 370,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 13252
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-01T17:15:15Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "would be nice to link to it",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 370,
+        "startChar": 7,
+        "endLine": 370,
+        "endChar": 20
+      },
+      "revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "5ecb9797_c47ae4ee",
+        "filename": "doc/source/stable-branches.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 371,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 13252
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2024-03-01T17:15:15Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Does it make sense to define a preferred way of contacting them? Like who would a new contributor even find out whom to contact?\n\nIIUC currently the team is only defined by gerrit membership, do you think it would be useful to define it as a SIG? that would for example allow to have some contact and membership information listed on the governance pages",
+      "revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     }
   ]
 }