a070f5b16c
In Python 3 __ne__ by default delegates to __eq__ and inverts the result, but in Python 2 they urge you to define __ne__ when you define __eq__ for it to work properly [1].There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false. Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected. [1]https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__ne_ Change-Id: Id2d32eedddbbbb91c6da6e36f12515972aa9e5a5 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
__init__.py | ||
auth.py | ||
base.py | ||
client.py | ||
exceptions.py | ||
fake_client.py | ||
utils.py |