swift-bench/0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084...

124 lines
4.7 KiB
Plaintext

{
"comments": [
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "17570255_f92daf4c",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 7233
},
"writtenOn": "2022-12-07T04:53:24Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "much better... man the state of the tests in swift-bench are horrible. A test would be good, but there doesn\u0027t seem to be much test infrastructure setup.\nSo that may be out of scope for your change, unless you want to work on some :) ",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "5d57c440_5bc08944",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 7233
},
"writtenOn": "2022-12-07T07:00:57Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Created https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift-bench/+/866826 as an attempt to start some test scaffolding for the swiftbench cli at least.",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "f36abaf1_853fd02c",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1179
},
"writtenOn": "2023-02-03T19:58:36Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "i don\u0027t think hiding the _0 with num_containers \u003d 1 actually works yet\n\nthe --container-name on the command line seems to override the conf option\n\nthe lack of testing in this project means we\u0027re wasting a lot of time on functional validation and it might be worth some small investment if we\u0027re going to develop it further.",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": false,
"key": {
"uuid": "752a3ff9_01863b12",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 15343
},
"writtenOn": "2023-02-17T22:42:31Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Do we like the direction Matt\u0027s taking with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift-bench/+/866826? Assuming we do, I might work on a optparse-\u003eargparse patch on top of it, then stack *this* on top of *that*...",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "5bc884e3_43116cdc",
"filename": "bin/swift-bench",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 121,
"author": {
"id": 1179
},
"writtenOn": "2023-02-03T19:58:36Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "i guess this is the main point of the change... it seems like we already support this option via config file?",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "a86240a7_01121d55",
"filename": "bin/swift-bench",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 164,
"author": {
"id": 1179
},
"writtenOn": "2023-02-03T19:58:36Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "i notice in this branch we convert options.num_containers to an int before we use it as such\n\nOMM when I tried to test this with `num_containers \u003d 1` in my bench.conf on my vsaio, I still got a container named `d9b155a78c3e41ccbdf2457ee55a2de8_0`\n\nusing pdb it appears this is because `options.num_containers \u003d\u003d \u00271\u0027` but `options.num_containers \u003d\u003d 1` is False",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "e666687a_2d07b8ce",
"filename": "bin/swift-bench",
"patchSetId": 2
},
"lineNbr": 164,
"author": {
"id": 15343
},
"writtenOn": "2023-02-17T22:42:31Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "Yeah, we probably should add `type\u003dint` all over the place when we\u0027re defining the parser.\n\nAlso, we should switch to argparse.\n\nOr, if that\u0027s a bit much yak to shave, just check `if int(options.num_containers) \u003d\u003d 1`.",
"parentUuid": "a86240a7_01121d55",
"revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
}
]
}