Using assertIsNone(xxx) instead of assertEqual(None, xxx)
Refer to OpenStack Style Guidelines: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/#unit-tests-and-assertraises [H203] Unit test assertions tend to give better messages for more specific assertions. As a result, assertIsNone(xxx) is preferred over assertEqual(None, xxx) Change-Id: I47d8974511cd3ebe927f0ee19ee6b0713dc6508d
This commit is contained in:
parent
6979e5ecfd
commit
ecee40d4ac
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ class TestConfigureBootAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
action = baremetal.ConfigureBootAction(node_uuid='MOCK_UUID',
|
||||
instance_boot_option='netboot')
|
||||
result = action.run(self.context)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
|
||||
self.node_update[0].update({'value': 'boot_option:netboot'})
|
||||
self.ironic.node.update.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
|
@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ class TestConfigureBootAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
def test_run_instance_boot_option_not_set(self):
|
||||
action = baremetal.ConfigureBootAction(node_uuid='MOCK_UUID')
|
||||
result = action.run(self.context)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
|
||||
self.node_update[0].update({'value': 'boot_option:local'})
|
||||
self.ironic.node.update.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ class TestConfigureBootAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
action = baremetal.ConfigureBootAction(node_uuid='MOCK_UUID')
|
||||
result = action.run(self.context)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
|
||||
self.node_update[0].update({'value': 'boot_option:netboot'})
|
||||
self.ironic.node.update.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ class TestConfigureBootAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
action = baremetal.ConfigureBootAction(node_uuid='MOCK_UUID',
|
||||
instance_boot_option='local')
|
||||
result = action.run(self.context)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
|
||||
self.node_update[0].update({'value': 'boot_option:local'})
|
||||
self.ironic.node.update.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
|
@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ class TestConfigureBootAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
ramdisk_name='test_ramdisk')
|
||||
result = action.run(self.context)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, None)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
|
||||
self.node_update[1].update({'value': 'test_ramdisk_id'})
|
||||
self.node_update[2].update({'value': 'test_kernel_id'})
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ class ClearBreakpointsActionTest(base.TestCase):
|
|||
action = package_update.ClearBreakpointsAction(self.stack_id,
|
||||
self.refs)
|
||||
result = action.run(mock_ctx)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(None, result)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result)
|
||||
mock_compute_client.assert_called_once()
|
||||
mock_orchestration_client.assert_called_once()
|
||||
mock_update_manager.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ class TestVerifyProfilesAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(expected.error['errors'].sort(),
|
||||
result.error['errors'].sort())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected.error['warnings'], result.error['warnings'])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(None, result.data)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result.data)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_not_enough_nodes(self):
|
||||
self.nodes[:] = [self._get_fake_node(profile='compute')]
|
||||
|
@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ class TestVerifyProfilesAction(base.TestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(expected.error['errors'].sort(),
|
||||
result.error['errors'].sort())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected.error['warnings'], result.error['warnings'])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(None, result.data)
|
||||
self.assertIsNone(result.data)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_no_spurious_warnings(self):
|
||||
self.nodes[:] = [self._get_fake_node(profile=None)]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue