Update patch set 1

Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1

(3 comments)

Patch-set: 1
Label: Code-Review=-1
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 1 2015-05-05 14:23:24 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent e5d03cc092
commit 9a3cd2256a
2 changed files with 55 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -34,6 +34,40 @@
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
},
{
"key": {
"uuid": "3acd31a7_96b44f82",
"filename": "src/main/java/hudson/plugins/gearman/MyGearmanWorkerImpl.java",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 256,
"author": {
"id": 1
},
"writtenOn": "2015-05-05T14:23:24Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "The \"if we\u0027re sleeping\" in the comment is important. This will have no effect if we have not already sent a PRE_SLEEP packet. Note that is generally a good thing because if we send more than one GRAB_JOB, gearman will happily send us more than one JOB_ASSIGN which we can not handle. However, because of the suppression, this can not be used to send the initial GRAB_JOB. More below.",
"revId": "4f2f53f38a857e6cae0061cb885270b41e44e7ca",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
},
{
"key": {
"uuid": "3acd31a7_76b9b378",
"filename": "src/main/java/hudson/plugins/gearman/MyGearmanWorkerImpl.java",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 301,
"author": {
"id": 1
},
"writtenOn": "2015-05-05T14:23:24Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "I expect we will get stuck here immediately at startup because we send no initial packet.",
"revId": "4f2f53f38a857e6cae0061cb885270b41e44e7ca",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
},
{
"key": {
"uuid": "3acd31a7_a0aee57e",

View File

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
{
"comments": [
{
"key": {
"uuid": "3acd31a7_56b35798",
"filename": "src/main/java/hudson/plugins/gearman/MyGearmanWorkerImpl.java",
"patchSetId": 1
},
"lineNbr": 306,
"author": {
"id": 1
},
"writtenOn": "2015-05-05T14:23:24Z",
"side": 0,
"message": "This code sends the initial GRAB_JOB packet that kicks off the state machine. This change omits this code, relying on enqueing a fake NOOP instead, but that won\u0027t work because we won\u0027t have sent a PRE_SLEEP before. I think something like this strategy is required, along with the other cases where sendGrabJob is reset (to make sure we always send the initial packet on reconnect.)",
"revId": "6de3cdd29bb8c4336a468985af6f8e0e4fd88e66",
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
"unresolved": false
}
]
}