Add HA section to template file
It was noted during the Dublin PTG that we had a gap in our Spec process as we did not ask people to consider impacts upon Cinder's Active/Active HA support. This patch adds a section asking the user to consider such implications. Change-Id: Ief51ab73f0cd3fece8cc8b5792b6dfd1e415aede
This commit is contained in:
parent
7fcc723674
commit
313674b3ca
|
@ -178,6 +178,29 @@ guidelines are a work in progress and are designed to help you identify
|
|||
security best practices. For further information, feel free to reach out
|
||||
to the OpenStack Security Group at openstack-security@lists.openstack.org.
|
||||
|
||||
Active/Active HA impact
|
||||
-----------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Describe any potential impact upon Cinder's Active/Active HA support. Some of the
|
||||
items to consider include:
|
||||
|
||||
* Could this impact stats/information reporting across multiple HA
|
||||
control nodes?
|
||||
|
||||
* Are there locking concerns that need to be addressed across multiple
|
||||
HA control nodes?
|
||||
|
||||
* Will RPC calls have to consider the cluster? I.E. use the
|
||||
"service_topic_queue" when calling the "_get_cctxt" method.
|
||||
|
||||
* Does this add a new cleanable resource?
|
||||
|
||||
* Does the operation require a state change in the workers table?
|
||||
|
||||
* Is there additional testing that might be necessary in an HA
|
||||
environment?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Notifications impact
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue