Merge "Declare plainly the current state of PostgreSQL in OpenStack"
This commit is contained in:
commit
a50d69d03f
|
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
|||
======================================================================
|
||||
2017-06-13 Document current level of community database support
|
||||
======================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Over the years, OpenStack's ecosystem and developer community grew
|
||||
around MySQL (as defined in [#f2]_). Emerging from the OpenStack
|
||||
User Survey 2017 [#f1]_ there is a trend visible that most production
|
||||
deployments today settle on MySQL as the configured database backend.
|
||||
|
||||
Although the OpenStack User Survey is non-authoritative, its reported
|
||||
bias (> 10 to 1 for MySQL [#f2]_ vs. PostgreSQL [#f3]_) is also
|
||||
mirrored in openstack-operator mailing list posts, ask.openstack.org
|
||||
posts, and content during operator meetups. In contrast, production
|
||||
deployments using PostgreSQL appear to be less popular ([#f4]_).
|
||||
|
||||
The OpenStack community is generally offering wide ranges of options
|
||||
to the users. For DBMS we advocate the use of abstraction layers
|
||||
like for example oslo.db and SQLAlchemy to avoid a lock-in on a
|
||||
specific database implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Still the development community could design and develop individual
|
||||
features with specific backends in mind. Even if portability issues
|
||||
are caught during code review and various levels of automated QA,
|
||||
there is still impact on the community like documentation and other
|
||||
cost of handling peculiarities of each DBMS like best practices
|
||||
for each implementation choice.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, we should clearly state that currently in the OpenStack
|
||||
community there is a bias towards MySQL [#f2]_ over other
|
||||
databases like for example PostgreSQL.
|
||||
|
||||
As a set of concrete steps we should do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- The OpenStack documentation should be updated to document the
|
||||
community preference::
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
|
||||
While OpenStack can be used with many SQL DBMS, please
|
||||
be aware that the upstream OpenStack developer community
|
||||
is so far focusing on the MySQL family of databases
|
||||
as a backend and tests OpenStack against the version of
|
||||
MySQL provided with Operating System distributions.
|
||||
|
||||
If you exclusively rely on the OpenStack upstream
|
||||
community and not on an OpenStack vendor for support of your
|
||||
OpenStack installation you are proceeding at your own
|
||||
risk by choosing a different DBMS backend.
|
||||
|
||||
- We should state to the OpenStack Foundation that there needs
|
||||
to be a way for distributors to report back aggregate data about
|
||||
their users, who are not self reporting to the survey. The upstream
|
||||
community does not have infinite resources, and is legitimately
|
||||
trying to make hard and informed decisions about things not to do.
|
||||
Because there is no mandatory registration of clouds, the best
|
||||
information we can get is via the User Survey and what vendors
|
||||
decide to share.
|
||||
|
||||
In the future we may want to make stronger statements, but the
|
||||
important thing is being clear to users that PostgreSQL is currently
|
||||
not first class supported upstream and there isn't any
|
||||
coordinated effort to change that.
|
||||
|
||||
This should not exclude vendors claiming support for other DBMS choices
|
||||
for their customers. However, for users bypassing vendors and
|
||||
going straight to upstream, the current reality of OpenStack
|
||||
enablement needs to be clear.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. rubric:: Footnotes
|
||||
|
||||
.. [#f1] April 2017 User Survey
|
||||
https://www.openstack.org/assets/survey/April2017SurveyReport.pdf
|
||||
.. [#f2] The term MySQL is used as a reference to the MySQL database and
|
||||
the close variants MariaDB and Galera.
|
||||
.. [#f3] The term PostgreSQL is used as a reference to the PostgreSQL
|
||||
database and close derivatives.
|
||||
.. [#f4] As of the Boston Forum (May 2017) known users of PostgreSQL
|
||||
are:
|
||||
|
||||
- SUSE: investigating migrating to Galera
|
||||
- Huawei: not actually PostgreSQL, but an internal db based on pg.
|
||||
- Windriver
|
||||
- SAP: consuming OpenStack directly, not via vendor. They
|
||||
did not respond to the user survey, so their usage is not
|
||||
recorded there.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue