Some fixes in comments
This patch fixed a couple of wrong comments. Change-Id: Iacb4d423ec0e62bdd9f1243d72a950cefbde46c3
This commit is contained in:
parent
62b0021500
commit
39fb7d996a
|
@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
|
|||
RAM Cost. Calculate instance placement costs by hosts' RAM usage.
|
||||
|
||||
The default is to spread instances across all hosts evenly. If you prefer
|
||||
stacking, you can set the 'ram_cost_multiplier' option to a positive
|
||||
stacking, you can set the 'ram_cost_multiplier' option to a negative
|
||||
number and the cost has the opposite effect of the default.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -64,9 +64,6 @@ class TenantRackAffinityCost(solver_costs.BaseLinearCost):
|
|||
for i in xrange(num_hosts):
|
||||
host_name = hosts[i].host
|
||||
host_racks = host_racks_map.get(host_name, set([]))
|
||||
|
||||
# if tenant not in host state then tenant network does not exist
|
||||
# there, hence no need for further check
|
||||
if project_id in hosts[i].projects:
|
||||
affinity_hosts.add(host_name)
|
||||
affinity_racks = affinity_racks.union(host_racks)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue