Update patch set 11
Patch Set 11: (1 comment) Patch-set: 11 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 5263 \u003c5263@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"removed on reply"} Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 13252 \u003c13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"Someone else replied on a comment you posted"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f9fd50699
commit
67f0ef0c64
|
@ -33,6 +33,24 @@
|
|||
"message": "Is there a better term than \"reviewer\" in this case? because CC: in this case is explicitly different from \"reviewers\". like just \"users\" as in the reno?",
|
||||
"revId": "43c92f2e7cc8ecad14b2b704adfc3db5cf8cd848",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "2f5270ca_41a471e2",
|
||||
"filename": "git-review.1",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 11
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 166,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 5263
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-12T20:01:06Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "It\u0027s unclear to me what the purpose of Cc\u0027ing a user is if not to review the change, but I can try to find different wording to help differentiate it.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "cc8c6284_b1752245",
|
||||
"revId": "43c92f2e7cc8ecad14b2b704adfc3db5cf8cd848",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue