Enhance tox output and fix spec formatting
Include file name for specs with missing subtitles. Include file name for specs with docutils errors. Removed empty file. Formatting errors fixed in specs: * Line length past 79 characters. * Consistent capitalization of subtitles (first word only, which was the majority of the existing ones). * Missing subtitle. * Unexpected indentation. * Title underline length too short. Change-Id: Ie319c80142bdc706cb849e8870d96f44b2045dcd
This commit is contained in:
parent
bcab90d57c
commit
7319e304d4
|
@ -10,16 +10,18 @@ Plexxi Driver
|
|||
|
||||
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/plexxi-driver
|
||||
|
||||
This blueprint is to layout the design of a driver that integrates PlexxiCore into congress.
|
||||
This blueprint is to layout the design of a driver that integrates PlexxiCore
|
||||
into congress.
|
||||
|
||||
Problem description
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
A detailed description of the problem:
|
||||
|
||||
* A PlexxiCore Database can contain a vast wealth of information about a network that can
|
||||
be an asset to a Congress system in a network where Plexxi is present, and without this
|
||||
driver Congress does not have access to this data.
|
||||
* A PlexxiCore Database can contain a vast wealth of information about a
|
||||
network that can be an asset to a Congress system in a network where
|
||||
Plexxi is present, and without this driver Congress does not have access
|
||||
to this data.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Proposed change
|
||||
|
@ -64,12 +66,15 @@ None
|
|||
REST API impact
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
Users of Congress who have PlexxiCore integrated in their network will now be able to access data stored in their PlexxiCore database through the congress API.
|
||||
Users of Congress who have PlexxiCore integrated in their network will now be
|
||||
able to access data stored in their PlexxiCore database through the congress
|
||||
API.
|
||||
|
||||
Security impact
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
Network data stored in the PlexxiCore Database will now be accessible through Congress
|
||||
Network data stored in the PlexxiCore Database will now be accessible through
|
||||
Congress
|
||||
|
||||
Notifications impact
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -105,7 +110,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
Conner-Ferguson
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -117,10 +122,11 @@ Dependencies
|
|||
Plexxi Class package
|
||||
Plexxi-Core used within the network
|
||||
|
||||
Testing
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation for the Driver is currently located in the bitbucket
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -71,17 +71,17 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Samta Rangare
|
||||
srangare@mvista.com
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
- Implement cinder driver with essential tables
|
||||
|
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
- Will need to add unit test code
|
||||
- Will add tempest tests.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ form:
|
|||
Example policies involving aggregates:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Restriction on number of ports on a subnet
|
||||
error(subnet) :- neutron:networks.subnets(subnet, port), neutron:ports(port, ip),
|
||||
count(num_port, port), not gt(num_port, 10)
|
||||
error(subnet) :- neutron:networks.subnets(subnet, port),
|
||||
neutron:ports(port, ip), count(num_port, port), not gt(num_port, 10)
|
||||
|
||||
2. Restriction on average CPU Load on a host
|
||||
error(host) :- ceilometer:meters(host, cpu_util), nova:servers(host, vm_host),
|
||||
|
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ average(x, y, z) :- sum(z, cpu_util), count(y, vm_host), div(x, z, y)
|
|||
the design/implementation progresses)
|
||||
|
||||
* The aggregates like "SUM", "COUNT" must be defined as ANTLR Terms and
|
||||
Congress must be able to parse and compile these terms.
|
||||
Congress must be able to parse and compile these terms.
|
||||
|
||||
The initial implementation will use SUM and COUNT as prototype aggregations.
|
||||
Other similar aggregates can be considered as enhancements to be taken up
|
||||
|
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
End user will be able to write policies involving aggregates.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluation of policies involving aggregates may involve additional processing
|
||||
|
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
Madhu Mohan (mmohan@mvista.com)
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Add new terms in Congress.g to allow ANTLR to recognize aggregate keywords
|
||||
|
@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
* Add Tempest tests
|
||||
* Create sample policies to test some real scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
* Docs for external consumption would need to be updated with explanation on
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Validation of inputs will have a negative performance impact on latency and
|
||||
|
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Create JSON schemas for each API resource (This is already done in the API
|
||||
|
@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ validation is being performed by issuing requests that should and should not
|
|||
validate against the schema.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
This change itself does not impact documentation. The addition of schemas
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ error(vm) :-
|
|||
neutron:port(vm, src_ip), //finds out the port that has the VM’s IP
|
||||
ids:ip_blacklist(dst_ip).
|
||||
|
||||
Policy Actions
|
||||
Policy actions
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
* Monitoring: report/log the incident including the VM’s IP address, external
|
||||
|
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Policy Actions
|
|||
access the VM) and/or a no route network or removing the VM network
|
||||
interface(s).
|
||||
|
||||
Data Sources
|
||||
Data sources
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
* IDS (intrusion detection service VM): IP address of the offending VM
|
||||
|
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Data Sources
|
|||
* nova: VM details; instance ID, interface(s) status, instance state, security
|
||||
group
|
||||
|
||||
Data Model Impact
|
||||
Data model impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
none
|
||||
|
@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
Unknown at this time
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Unknown at this time
|
||||
|
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Unknown at this time
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Congress IDS plugin
|
||||
|
@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -141,18 +141,18 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
@ -170,18 +170,20 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Define translation functions.
|
||||
|
||||
* Implement the new constant tables and function tables to perform the translation.
|
||||
* Implement the new constant tables and function tables to perform the
|
||||
translation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
* This is dependent on the implementation of a GBP data-source driver for Congress.
|
||||
* This is dependent on the implementation of a GBP data-source driver for
|
||||
Congress.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
Some sample input tables will be created and the translation verified by
|
||||
checking the contents of the output trigger tables.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
All translation details will be documented.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -84,30 +84,33 @@ way to spell the tablename.]
|
|||
To do this, Congress would need to know which columns in a table are sufficient
|
||||
to uniquely identify a row, which in most cases is just the ID.
|
||||
|
||||
Pros: (i) this requires only changes in the datasource drivers; everything else
|
||||
Pros:
|
||||
(i) this requires only changes in the datasource drivers; everything else
|
||||
remains the same
|
||||
(ii) still leveraging database technology under the hood
|
||||
(iii) policy is robust to changes in fields of original data
|
||||
Cons: (i) datasource driver can force policy writer to use wide tables
|
||||
(ii) this data model is much different than the original data models
|
||||
(iii) we need primary-key information about tables
|
||||
(ii) still leveraging database technology under the hood
|
||||
(iii) policy is robust to changes in fields of original data
|
||||
|
||||
Cons:
|
||||
(i) datasource driver can force policy writer to use wide tables
|
||||
(ii) this data model is much different than the original data models
|
||||
(iii) we need primary-key information about tables
|
||||
|
||||
3) Enhance the Congress policy language to handle objects natively.
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of writing a rule like the following ...
|
||||
|
||||
p(port_id, name, group) :-
|
||||
neutron:ports(port_id, addr_pairs, security_groups, extra_dhcp_opts,
|
||||
binding_cap, status, name, admin_state_up, network_id, tenant_id,
|
||||
binding_vif, device_owner, mac_address, fixed_ips, router_id, binding_host),
|
||||
neutron:ports.security_groups(security_group, group)
|
||||
neutron:ports(port_id, addr_pairs, security_groups, extra_dhcp_opts,
|
||||
binding_cap, status, name, admin_state_up, network_id, tenant_id,
|
||||
binding_vif, device_owner, mac_address, fixed_ips, router_id, binding_host),
|
||||
neutron:ports.security_groups(security_group, group)
|
||||
|
||||
we would write a rule such as
|
||||
p(port_id, name) :-
|
||||
neutron:ports(port),
|
||||
port.name(name),
|
||||
port.id(port_id),
|
||||
port.security_groups(group)
|
||||
neutron:ports(port),
|
||||
port.name(name),
|
||||
port.id(port_id),
|
||||
port.security_groups(group)
|
||||
|
||||
The big difference here is that the period (.) is an operator in the language,
|
||||
just as in C++/Java.
|
||||
|
@ -186,19 +189,19 @@ Other UIs can expose this enhanced syntax, but since currently all UIs
|
|||
just pass policy statements as strings, they will require no actual changes
|
||||
to leverage the enhancement.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Should have no performance impact, with the possible exception that
|
||||
eventually we will want to reverse the preprocessing step for tracing
|
||||
so that we present users with a more intuitive trace.
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -214,13 +217,13 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
thinrich
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Modify grammar
|
||||
* Make datasource schemas available to runtime
|
||||
* Add preprocessor to rule AST constructor to convert column references into
|
||||
positional references.
|
||||
positional references.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Dependencies
|
||||
|
@ -237,7 +240,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
No tempest tests are necessary. Unit tests only.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
Should include modifications to docs to simplify the examples that use
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,18 +87,18 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
It will be possible to turn off high-cost status computation; thus, people
|
||||
can decide whether each status item is worth the cost of computing it.
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -115,12 +115,12 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
<launchpad-id or None>
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
- Add implementations for metrics. The decision as to whether the metric
|
||||
is continually computed or computed on demand will be made on a metric-by-metric
|
||||
basis.
|
||||
is continually computed or computed on demand will be made on a
|
||||
metric-by-metric basis.
|
||||
|
||||
- Add status() method to DeepSix class and return a dictionary of metrics.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ status metrics are as expected. Ideally would also simulate metric computation
|
|||
under load.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -67,17 +67,17 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
arosen
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
|
||||
Will add tempest tests.
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -94,19 +94,19 @@ The end user will be able to go to the Policies panel in Horizon and use some
|
|||
knobs to write policy rules and create a policy in Congress.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
<launchpad-id or None>
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
- Knobs and form to enter policy details and rules.
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Additional Tempest tests are not needed because the Congress code is not being
|
|||
modified here.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
|
||||
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
================================================
|
||||
Congress OpenStack Horizon Dashboard Integration
|
||||
==========================================
|
||||
================================================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/horizon-integration
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Proposed change
|
|||
Horizon
|
||||
* A new panel named `policies` will be added to the `admin` dashboard.
|
||||
|
||||
+-----------+ +------------+
|
||||
+-----------+ +------------+
|
||||
| ++------+ | |
|
||||
| || | REST API Call| |
|
||||
| || +------------------> |
|
||||
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ to integrate congress in a non openstack scenario.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Screens
|
||||
------
|
||||
-------
|
||||
none
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -126,17 +126,17 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
* User will be able to data exposed by the DataSources
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
none
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Integration with Devstack.
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
none
|
||||
|
@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
<None>
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
* Add base Panel for Policies
|
||||
|
@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
Unit testing using mocks.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
Document the screenflow.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,9 +66,10 @@ nova: and neutron:) on datasource tablenames. This proposal simply
|
|||
generalizes that idea.
|
||||
|
||||
Another approach is to put everything into a single theory and explicitly
|
||||
prefix all tables with the module in which they are defined. Implementationally,
|
||||
that is basically what we're doing, but leaving the policies in separate
|
||||
datastructures so that they can leverage different theory types.
|
||||
prefix all tables with the module in which they are defined.
|
||||
Implementationally, that is basically what we're doing, but leaving the
|
||||
policies in separate datastructures so that they can leverage different theory
|
||||
types.
|
||||
|
||||
Many other module systems are available, but this is basically Python's
|
||||
module system. Everything is visible to everything as long as you
|
||||
|
@ -120,28 +121,29 @@ Each API method which is either added or changed should have the following
|
|||
create_policy
|
||||
|
||||
* Description: create a new policy of the given name, abbreviation, and
|
||||
type
|
||||
type
|
||||
* Method: POST
|
||||
* Normal http response codes: success
|
||||
* HTTP errors:
|
||||
** conflict: policy already exists
|
||||
** bad request: type does not exist
|
||||
** conflict: policy already exists
|
||||
** bad request: type does not exist
|
||||
* URL: /v1/policy/
|
||||
* Parameters: name, abbreviation (for traces), type (Nonrecursive, Materialized)
|
||||
* Parameters: name, abbreviation (for traces), type (Nonrecursive,
|
||||
Materialized)
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
curl -X PUT http://localhost:1789/v1/policy -d
|
||||
'{"id": "test_policy",
|
||||
"description": "a great policy",
|
||||
"abbreviation": "test",
|
||||
"type": "nonrecursive"}'
|
||||
'{"id": "test_policy",
|
||||
"description": "a great policy",
|
||||
"abbreviation": "test",
|
||||
"type": "nonrecursive"}'
|
||||
|
||||
Example output:
|
||||
{"id": "test_policy",
|
||||
"description": "a great policy",
|
||||
"abbreviation": "test",
|
||||
"type": "nonrecursive",
|
||||
"owner": "alice"}'
|
||||
{"id": "test_policy",
|
||||
"description": "a great policy",
|
||||
"abbreviation": "test",
|
||||
"type": "nonrecursive",
|
||||
"owner": "alice"}'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
delete_policy: standard deletion operation
|
||||
|
@ -165,17 +167,17 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
Users will interact with other policies when writing rules.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
@ -191,28 +193,28 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
thinrichs@vmware.com
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
- Add create_policy/delete_policy to congress/policy/policy.py:Runtime.
|
||||
The arguments to create_policy should include name/abbr/type, where
|
||||
type is either NonrecursiveRuleTheory or MaterializedViewTheory.
|
||||
The arguments to create_policy should include name/abbr/type, where
|
||||
type is either NonrecursiveRuleTheory or MaterializedViewTheory.
|
||||
|
||||
- Change compile.atom to a separate 'module' field and 'table' field to
|
||||
avoid repeatedly parsing the tablename. The 'module' field is None if
|
||||
there is none.
|
||||
avoid repeatedly parsing the tablename. The 'module' field is None if
|
||||
there is none.
|
||||
|
||||
- Modify top_down_eval so that at every point in the search, it
|
||||
jumps to the policy in which the table is defined (or stays in the
|
||||
current policy if 'module' is None).
|
||||
jumps to the policy in which the table is defined (or stays in the
|
||||
current policy if 'module' is None).
|
||||
|
||||
- Ensure no infinite loops across theories. We need to check
|
||||
that the graph obtained by rules that cross policy boundaries
|
||||
is non-recursive; we can ignore rules that do not cross policy
|
||||
boundaries.
|
||||
that the graph obtained by rules that cross policy boundaries
|
||||
is non-recursive; we can ignore rules that do not cross policy
|
||||
boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
- Can leave 'includes' functionality for internal implementation.
|
||||
Should not need to use it for the change above.
|
||||
Should not need to use it for the change above.
|
||||
|
||||
- Expose this functionality through the API and CLI
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ q(x) :- policy1:p(x)
|
|||
Should throw error.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
Need to add docs that describe new capabilities.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,13 +37,13 @@ Policy
|
|||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Policy Actions
|
||||
Policy actions
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Data Sources
|
||||
Data sources
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
@ -77,17 +77,17 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
|
||||
* Users will now have to deploy a db for congress to leverage.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
* Hopefully none
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
arosen
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation
|
||||
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Testing
|
|||
|
||||
Unit tests will be provided
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This added functionality may or may not come with a performance cost.
|
||||
|
@ -104,11 +104,11 @@ MaterializedViewTheory will incur no performance cost because it already
|
|||
evaluates all tables at every insert/delete.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
None outside of Congress. Developers can ignore the new interface
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
Primary assignee:
|
||||
Tim Hinrichs
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
- Add event-handler registry to theory base class
|
||||
|
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ Unit tests: register event handler, insert/delete policy data, check if
|
|||
event handler actually executed
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -96,20 +96,20 @@ Other end user impact
|
|||
None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This change will have an effect as soon as it is merged, but Congress should
|
||||
behave exactly as it did without the change.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
The new refactoring will change how programmers write datasource drivers. The
|
||||
|
@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Assignee(s)
|
|||
ayip
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
1) Write new superclass.
|
||||
|
@ -146,10 +146,11 @@ None
|
|||
Testing
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
Unit tests for superclass, and modify existing test cases for individual drivers.
|
||||
Unit tests for superclass, and modify existing test cases for individual
|
||||
drivers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
This change will include new documentation for how to use the new datasource
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -86,14 +86,14 @@ error(vm) :-
|
|||
ids:ip_blacklist(dst_ip).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Policy Actions
|
||||
Policy actions
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
Describe the policy activities in terms of monitoring, reactive, proactive,
|
||||
and other ways to explain how the policy will implement it's desired state.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Data Sources
|
||||
Data sources
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Describe which projects and/or services the data is coming from
|
||||
|
@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ feature?
|
|||
* Does this change have an impact on python-congressclient? What does the user
|
||||
interface there look like?
|
||||
|
||||
Performance Impact
|
||||
Performance impact
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example
|
||||
|
@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ Examples of things to consider here include:
|
|||
* Will the change include any locking, and if so what considerations are there
|
||||
on holding the lock?
|
||||
|
||||
Other Deployer Impacts
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
Other deployer impact
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure OpenStack
|
||||
that have not already been mentioned, such as:
|
||||
|
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ that have not already been mentioned, such as:
|
|||
we have a special case in the code? Do we assume that the operator will
|
||||
recreate all the instances in their cloud?
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Impact
|
||||
Developer impact
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
Discuss things that will affect other developers working on OpenStack,
|
||||
|
@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ Primary assignee:
|
|||
Other contributors:
|
||||
<launchpad-id or None>
|
||||
|
||||
Work Items
|
||||
Work items
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
|
||||
|
@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
|
|||
Dependencies
|
||||
============
|
||||
|
||||
* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in congress, or in other
|
||||
projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
|
||||
* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in congress, or in
|
||||
other projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
|
||||
|
||||
* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used
|
||||
by congress (such as the glance v2 API when we previously only required v1),
|
||||
|
@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ software configurations available)? If so, are there mitigation plans (3rd
|
|||
party testing, gate enhancements, etc).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Documentation Impact
|
||||
Documentation impact
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
What is the impact on the docs team of this change? Some changes might require
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ class TestTitles(testtools.TestCase):
|
|||
def _check_titles(self, fname, titles):
|
||||
expected_titles = ('Problem description', 'Proposed change',
|
||||
'Implementation', 'Dependencies',
|
||||
'Testing', 'Documentation Impact',
|
||||
'Testing', 'Documentation impact',
|
||||
'References')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
sorted(expected_titles),
|
||||
|
@ -49,19 +49,20 @@ class TestTitles(testtools.TestCase):
|
|||
"Expected titles not found in document %s" % fname)
|
||||
|
||||
proposed = 'Proposed change'
|
||||
self.assertIn('Alternatives', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Data model impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('REST API impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Security impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Notifications impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Other end user impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Performance Impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Other deployer impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Developer impact', titles[proposed])
|
||||
msg = 'Subtitle missing from %s' % fname
|
||||
self.assertIn('Alternatives', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Data model impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('REST API impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Security impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Notifications impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Other end user impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Performance impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Other deployer impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Developer impact', titles[proposed], message=msg)
|
||||
|
||||
impl = 'Implementation'
|
||||
self.assertIn('Assignee(s)', titles[impl])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Work Items', titles[impl])
|
||||
self.assertIn('Assignee(s)', titles[impl], message=msg)
|
||||
self.assertIn('Work items', titles[impl], message=msg)
|
||||
|
||||
def _check_lines_wrapping(self, tpl, raw):
|
||||
for i, line in enumerate(raw.split("\n")):
|
||||
|
@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ class TestTitles(testtools.TestCase):
|
|||
with open(filename) as f:
|
||||
data = f.read()
|
||||
|
||||
spec = docutils.core.publish_doctree(data)
|
||||
spec = docutils.core.publish_doctree(data, source_path=filename)
|
||||
titles = self._get_titles(spec)
|
||||
self._check_titles(filename, titles)
|
||||
self._check_lines_wrapping(filename, data)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue