parent
7336aab9cc
commit
9fbff81d72
|
@ -142,6 +142,30 @@
|
|||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "5f7c97a3_62507f2d",
|
||||
"filename": "specs/rocky/vitrage-resources.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 84,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 19159
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2018-07-04T10:12:52Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Actually, there are two alternatives for writing the Vitrage template:\n\n1. If an instance X is down -\u003e execute a Mistral healing workflow for instance X and stack Y\n\n2. If an instance that belongs to stack Y is down -\u003e execute a Mistral healing workflow for that instance and stack Y\n\nX should be Y are specific ids. In the second alternative, the check is for *any* instance that belongs to the stack.\n\nWhich option is better in your opinion?\nThe input for Vitrage template should be: alarm name, optional instance id, Heat stack id, and Mistral workflow details\n\n(BTW, in the future we will also have options 3,4,... for templates of network failures)",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "5f7c97a3_0763ddb2",
|
||||
"range": {
|
||||
"startLine": 84,
|
||||
"startChar": 10,
|
||||
"endLine": 84,
|
||||
"endChar": 46
|
||||
},
|
||||
"revId": "7888aecf10cf6a2d0f76d0f8532e6b49114ad4ff",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
|
||||
"unresolved": false
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "5f7c97a3_0e84685c",
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue