Update patch set 5

Patch Set 5: Code-Review+1

(1 comment)

Cool, this all seems reasonable.

Patch-set: 5
Reviewer: Gerrit User 4257 <4257@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
Label: Code-Review=+1

f91c7b237196ba25042d5b5e0d0284ba282dfe0d

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+{
+  "comments": [
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "ffd0ebdf_158860c4",
+        "filename": "specs/stein/vitrage-resources.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 5
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 64,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 4257
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2019-01-04T01:15:03Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "description probably makes more sense as a top-level property.\n\nIt occurs to me that in Heat we actually have a \u0027description\u0027 at the top level of a resource (i.e. the same level as \u0027type\u0027 and \u0027properties\u0027), and that we should probably actually pass _that_ as the description for underlying resources that have one. No resource type has ever implemented that though.",
+      "revId": "f91c7b237196ba25042d5b5e0d0284ba282dfe0d",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    }
+  ]
+}