Update patch set 4
Patch Set 4: (1 comment) Patch-set: 4 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 24828 \u003c24828@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_24828\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
4ee152f507
commit
841c671557
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "e47ca181_a98b55dc",
|
||||
"filename": "specs/approved/mercury.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 56,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 24828
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-04-24T01:14:18Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Hi Julia, it\u0027s an exciting idea!\nIt looks like we will have a new rpc service which is mainly responsible for the switch configuration, I wonder how it relates with the ngs?\nIf it\u0027s not function as an IPAM, do we have other mechanisms to land the network configuration like ip assignment, dhcp service, in case neutron is not available?\nAlso, in the openstack scenario, the \"network\" team may provide ml2 plugin into neutron service so they act as the sole entry to the network complexity from the ironic perspective. I wonder how the new service would cope in 😊",
|
||||
"revId": "6aeec08df09662a289b7ef8a59d79a3c00dd3d8d",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue