Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (2 comments) Patch-set: 1 CC: Gerrit User 13252 <13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ab739529c
commit
d5ac563702
|
@ -16,6 +16,46 @@
|
|||
"message": "Well, this is a simple description of the main idea. Should we add here anything else? Do you want any special handling of how to get membership?\n\nnote:\n- who became a member of openstack-unmaintained-core group will have right to add additional members to the group, there won\u0027t be a smaller group who controls the membership, as far as i understand the group setup\n- people who are added to the group will have rights to every repository and every unmaintained branch\n\nDo I understand this well? Do we want to have a formal way of membership query vial e.g. a mail to ML with [unmaintained] tag or something?",
|
||||
"revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3a92a846_38d7e17c",
|
||||
"filename": "doc/source/stable-branches.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 370,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13252
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-01T17:15:15Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "would be nice to link to it",
|
||||
"range": {
|
||||
"startLine": 370,
|
||||
"startChar": 7,
|
||||
"endLine": 370,
|
||||
"endChar": 20
|
||||
},
|
||||
"revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "5ecb9797_c47ae4ee",
|
||||
"filename": "doc/source/stable-branches.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 371,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13252
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-03-01T17:15:15Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Does it make sense to define a preferred way of contacting them? Like who would a new contributor even find out whom to contact?\n\nIIUC currently the team is only defined by gerrit membership, do you think it would be useful to define it as a SIG? that would for example allow to have some contact and membership information listed on the governance pages",
|
||||
"revId": "8f25583cabd1424b9520efe29556e9c2b18c4fd3",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue