Update patch set 3

Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1

(2 comments)

One of Dawid's points still needs addressing.

Patch-set: 3
Label: Code-Review=+1

a96f101677ae0379f20faf98f3a4902b3c502e08

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{
+  "comments": [
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "ba5201f7_666dfd97",
+        "filename": "specs/newton/approved/newton-instance-ha-vm-recovery-spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 49,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 2394
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2017-01-04T02:18:03Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "As Dawid pointed out, this is not a recovery method and is outside the scope of this spec, so it should be deleted.",
+      "revId": "a96f101677ae0379f20faf98f3a4902b3c502e08",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    },
+    {
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "ba5201f7_a62b65ea",
+        "filename": "specs/newton/approved/newton-instance-ha-vm-recovery-spec.rst",
+        "patchSetId": 3
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 77,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 2394
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2017-01-04T02:18:03Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Are these really alternatives?  To me it sounds like they all satisfy the description of the proposed change above, i.e. they are valid ways of implementing the proposed change, not fundamentally different approaches to solving the problem.  Maybe I am misunderstanding?",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 77,
+        "startChar": 0,
+        "endLine": 77,
+        "endChar": 52
+      },
+      "revId": "a96f101677ae0379f20faf98f3a4902b3c502e08",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543",
+      "unresolved": false
+    }
+  ]
+}