Update patch set 2

Patch Set 2:

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 2
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1179 \u003c1179@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_15343\u003e replied on the change"}

0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924

@@ -51,6 +51,23 @@
       "revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     },
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "752a3ff9_01863b12",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 15343
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2023-02-17T22:42:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Do we like the direction Matt\u0027s taking with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift-bench/+/866826? Assuming we do, I might work on a optparse-\u003eargparse patch on top of it, then stack *this* on top of *that*...",
+      "revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
     {
       "unresolved": true,
       "key": {
@@ -84,6 +101,24 @@
       "message": "i notice in this branch we convert options.num_containers to an int before we use it as such\n\nOMM when I tried to test this with `num_containers \u003d 1` in my bench.conf on my vsaio, I still got a container named `d9b155a78c3e41ccbdf2457ee55a2de8_0`\n\nusing pdb it appears this is because `options.num_containers \u003d\u003d \u00271\u0027` but `options.num_containers \u003d\u003d 1` is False",
       "revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
       "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "e666687a_2d07b8ce",
+        "filename": "bin/swift-bench",
+        "patchSetId": 2
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 164,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 15343
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2023-02-17T22:42:31Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Yeah, we probably should add `type\u003dint` all over the place when we\u0027re defining the parser.\n\nAlso, we should switch to argparse.\n\nOr, if that\u0027s a bit much yak to shave, just check `if int(options.num_containers) \u003d\u003d 1`.",
+      "parentUuid": "a86240a7_01121d55",
+      "revId": "0fe85015dbef0655f70fcdb0084f1a37ec169924",
+      "serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
     }
   ]
 }