Add Production Use data for Ocata
Using (early/unreleased) survey data for deployments updated between 2017-01-17 and 2017-02-17, * Isolate deployments in "Production or Full Operational Use" * Look for project usage either in "Production" or "Testing" * Count the project use, and calculate an overall percentage by dividing by the number of deployments (253) Keystone (Identity Service) 225 95.74% Nova (Compute) 224 95.32% Glance (Image Service) 222 94.47% Neutron (Networking) 218 92.77% Cinder (Block Storage) 207 88.09% Horizon (Dashboard) 205 87.23% Heat (Orchestration) 157 66.81% Ceilometer (Metering & Monitoring) 131 55.74% Swift (Object Storage) 121 51.49% Rally (Benchmark Service) 52 22.13% Ironic (Bare Metal) 48 20.43% Designate (DNS Service) 38 16.17% Manila (Shared File Systems) 33 14.04% Trove (Database Service) 30 12.77% Kolla (Containerized Deployment) 30 12.77% Murano (Application Catalog) 29 12.34% Magnum(Containers Service) 26 11.06% Sahara (Data Processing) 24 10.21% Barbican (Key Management) 20 8.51% TripleO (Deployment) 20 8.51% Mistral (Workflow Service) 13 5.53% Zaqar (Message Service) 9 3.83% Congress (Governance Service) 5 2.13% Magnetodb (Key-Value Store as a Service) 5 2.13% Solum (Software Dev Lifecycle Mgmt) 5 2.13% Cue (Message Broker Service) 4 1.70% Change-Id: I6cbe6e9d6299551d64c938d23f294178737a720a
This commit is contained in:
parent
f9ddbed27e
commit
282f1385d4
|
@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"Compute service (Nova)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "96%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Object Storage service (Swift)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "51%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Image service (Glance)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "94%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Identity service (Keystone)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "96%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Dashboard (Horizon)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "87%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Networking service (Neutron)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "93%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Block Storage service (Cinder)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "88%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Telemetry service (Ceilometer)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "56%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Orchestration service (Heat)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "67%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Database service (Trove)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "13%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Data Processing service (Sahara)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "10%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Bare Metal service (Ironic)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "20%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Message service (Zaqar)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "4%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Key Management service (Barbican)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "9%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"DNS service (Designate)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "16%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Shared File Systems service (Manila)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "14%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Benchmark service (Rally)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "22%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Containers service (Magnum)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "11%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Application Catalog service (Murano)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "12%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Deployment service (TripleO)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "9%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Governance service (Congress)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Container-based deployment tools (Kolla)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "13%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Workflow service (Mistral)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "6%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Message Broker service (Cue)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Software Dev Lifecycle Management service (Solum)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Key-Value Store as a Service (Magnetodb)":
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "2%"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue