development-proposals/forum/201705-bos/TAG-newfeature.md

1.6 KiB

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-Features-Missing-For-Public-Clouds: 24: * Self-service signup - +1+1+1 ##painpoint ##newfeature

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-Features-Missing-For-Public-Clouds: 29: * Domain level quote management: domain admin can create users ##newfeature

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-Features-Missing-For-Public-Clouds: 42: * Volume multi-attach ##newfeature

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-qa-tools-plugins: 58: * Are there any container projects or something for Tempest? ##newfeature, ##gap ?

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-qa-tools-plugins: 95: * Check status of services ##newfeature, ##uservoice

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-skip-level-upgrading: 31: *Many very large operators, running highly available, complex OpenStack environments, are running on old versions of (OpenStack Icehouse, Juno, Kilo...). The reason is because upgrading is highly painful and stabilizing platforms has often been the greater priority. How can they catch up and realize the benefits found in current releases? ##uservoice ##newfeature

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-skip-level-upgrading: 69: * ##newfeature Skip-level upgrading. How many versions? Is there a path to where the number of versions does not matter?

https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-skip-level-upgrading: 70: * ##newfeature Live upgrades would help ease the pain in doing upgrades. Need to clarify the definition of "live". what do you accept and what you do not. (e.g. API down time, service down time, migration of workload, etc)